DIARY
Does MACD work?
Settings, timeframes, zero line, histogram and divergence: 10 tests.
RESULTConclusion
- Only 1 of 10 was positive after costs (+0.7%), and it lost in the second half.
- The slower 19-39-9 made +35.1% before costs, better than the standard 12-26-9 (+19.7%) and better than random. After costs it was still −12.0%.
- More trades meant bigger losses from costs. The spread outweighed the small pre-cost bias.
BEFORE AND AFTER COSTSBefore and after costs
Before costsAfter costs
ALL TESTSAll 10 tests
| Condition | Trades | Win rate | Before costs | After costs | 1st half | 2nd half | Random avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cross 12-26-9 H1 | 39,932 | 34.0% | +19.7% | −41.7% | −34.2% | −7.5% | −63.5% |
| cross 12-26-9 D1 | 2,090 | 34.4% | −2.2% | −5.2% | +3.8% | −9.0% | −2.3% |
| cross 5-35-5 H1 | 69,138 | 31.0% | +4.4% | −103.2% | −69.5% | −33.7% | −109.0% |
| cross 8-17-9 H1 | 51,395 | 33.4% | +1.8% | −78.0% | −57.0% | −21.1% | −81.0% |
| cross 19-39-9 H1 | 30,688 | 33.8% | +35.1% | −12.0% | −6.9% | −5.2% | −49.2% |
| cross 5-35-5 D1 | 3,537 | 33.9% | +5.8% | +0.7% | +5.4% | −4.6% | −3.6% |
| zero line H1 | 17,690 | 28.4% | −3.9% | −31.1% | −17.7% | −13.4% | −24.4% |
| cross beyond zero H1 | 20,513 | 50.2% | +13.0% | −18.6% | −13.8% | −4.8% | −33.2% |
| histogram turn H1 | 47,875 | 49.5% | −11.2% | −85.6% | −56.3% | −29.3% | −76.4% |
| divergence H1 | 18,717 | 49.7% | −0.2% | −28.7% | −16.2% | −12.5% | −31.8% |
This diary records tests on historical data. It does not recommend any method or symbol and does not indicate future profit or loss. Please make investment decisions at your own risk.